Comment from Theodore McDowell

Excellent

Well done. I really like the last line that describes hearts singing. Describes almost a foreign feeling of magic from the highlands of Scotland or the lands of Ireland. The sense of the mystical fits well with the theme of God's beauty.

 Comment Written 14-Jun-2021

Comment from royowen

Excellent

I remember seeing mountain homes in Switzerland, they were such beautiful structures, I'm not sure where these particular homes are, well done, good writing, blessings Roy

 Comment Written 14-Jun-2021

Comment from lancellot

Good

Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.

 Comment Written 14-Jun-2021

---

reply by the author on 14-Jun-2021

Thank you, thank you and thank you, I feel proud of that a great writer of your stature has written me a review or tried to write me a review of my work in a few words.


I am not happy at your same age-old, awkward and attacking words to use as derogatory against or to a writer. I have courtesy, not like you, explained each word of your review later. Have patience to read to the last.


So far as this review is concerned, I write, you love to assume, presume most and you are not intelligent, not innovative and never, never a positive person, for I know you are first not a good man or good person, that is why you write such foolish, impractical and assumed words for you cannot do anything better and still foolishly write derogatory comments.


After reading your review, with due honour and respect I request you, I do earnestly request you please do not review my works in the future, for you write rubbish, you write foolishly, you write impractically and you write inhumanly, as I mention, if you re-read your review.


Having received the review, copy of your review is given many times later, being a human being; please stop reviewing my work if you want to help me.


As you have written a review, I write please do not try to write such reviews that can only harass me and that cannot help me to improve me anyway.


It is evident, after reading your derogatory and incomplete review, I write please do not try to prove yourself wiser by writing some of your favourite and impractical words or thoughts to cause loss to me for you have no idea, concept, knowledge or wisdom to help a writer or poet.


Again, I write, as you have sent me a review that is so confusing and half-hearted, and written incorrectly; so, please do not be tempted to write your controversial, impractical, improver, wrong, derogatory reviews and send me reviews falsely thinking or pleading you are helping me or knowing fully that you are going to cause losses to me desperately feeling and knowing that I cannot do any harm to you like an inhuman, because you are already in higher state and status.


Truly, as harmful and unfair review you have written, so I write, please, please, please and please stop writing such an unhelpful and merely and cheaply written review.


You have written:
Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


Why you write like a civilized and wise person (hmmm, okay)? Does it help me anyway? No, it is seer foolishness to write in a review. Particularly in a few words, you have written nothing about the work but you have written how to prove me wrong, wrongly and impractically or impracticably.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.

Is not your writing controversial? Once you write you have understood and in the next line you write there is confusion. Are you intelligible? Are you wise? Are you learned? Are you civilized? Are you sober? Are you expressive? Are you rational? Are you not a fool? Are you not an impractical man? Are you not shaky? You are not confident of what you write. You write controversially. You do not know the art of writing reviews. You do not know how to write a correct sentence. You have written two sentences, both the sentences are controversial, unfair and cheap. If you have achieved something in writing that does not mean you are a wise, civil person and a human being, as you think, your writing proves so. At first be a good man, and then learn how to write, and then try to be a writer.


Please, please, please stop thinking yourself a wise man, or a wise writer, or God who knows everything and knows writing everything.


Please, please and please stop writing without reading the work you review thoroughly, without understanding the work fully and without writing the limitations of writing.


Please, please, and please stop writing reviews meaninglessly, derogatorily, impractically and foolishly.


Please, please and please stop writing reviews that cannot help the writers but only harass the writers that you cannot do.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


What is the use of writing a review like this where you cannot write examples or where you write point blank or like a blind person or foolish and you are unable to write any illustration, example, guideline, hint, or anything that can help the writer to know what you write is practical and what you write is purposive or purposeful or beneficial to the writer.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


What really you mean by writing a derogatory sentence, though the sentence is incorrect, for I get the feeling that English is your second language like me but I do not write like you, but you wish to prove you are master of English but you have not achieved yet proficiency in writing in English, but you have started offering suggestions to authors or writers in a few words without giving any example or without writing illustrations to accept your advice, suggestion, comment, prescription, commendation or anything like this.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


You have not given any example how a writer can see or make to stand his writing, I mean by what method, or by what art, or by using what, in my poem, you have not shown how I could stand in my writing, but you write in a complaining tone or simply criticizing, evidently, you write reviews to earn some extra money and not to help the writers. That is why you write anything and everything impractical and you have no examples to write or give or offer to the writers.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


You have written the review like a wise reviewer but you do not know you have proved with your words evidently and clearly that you are nothing more than a cheap writer who has not yet learnt how to write a review.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


You have sent a review, as you think so, but in real world, or professionally, you have just joined some words to earn something out of writing a review and just by filling some words to make a filler review not a helpful review for you do not know how to write a review. You have written just to harass me and earn some dollars by writing what you poorly think impractically.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


You have written the review, as you think, for you do not know what is a review writing, simply to write re-view of the work and not just writing anything you wish to write even if you know or know not it is practical or practicable or professionally right.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


Your review is meaningless, cheap and just filler words to earn some dollars by doing the job where there is no risk of losing anything but earning. I find, as it is evident, you are not a responsible person because you are not a good man.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


You do not know writing a review. You have not mentioned what is the confusion, where is the confusion, what confuses you, what is there that is so confusing that you had to mention but you have not shown your intelligence, wisdom by describing or explaining or giving any example of what you say or write in the review or you do not know what you are writing or you do not believe what you are writing is worthy or true or practicable to mention.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


You have written the review just with a pomp and style like a wise man but in the next sentence you have proved yourself how unwise you are and how impractical person you are.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


You have written a review without a word of explanation or illustration or exemplification like a fool or illiterate or unwise person and I am sure, you have written everything knowingly and simply to harass me and prove me wrong and unwise or foolish person; yes you are right, because you think foolishly, you like to think like a crooked fellow who knows only to cause losses to writers instead of helping them rightly, properly, fairly, truly, professionally and righteously.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


Your review is incomplete, partial, derogatory and mean-minded. You have not given any examples, illustrations or anything to show me the right way to learn or correct me in case there is any fault or error in my words.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


You have written the review like an incomplete, imperfect, impractical, impracticable, impolite, insensible and heartless person for you are, as your writing speaks or reveals, not a good man, for you know how to complain or criticize anyone instantly like a greedy or foolish man and you do not know the answer but you write the writer wrong.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


You have written this jumbled, scrambled, filler or disjointed or disjoined or inharmonic or non-concording or inharmonious words in your review without giving any answer to your question, like a foolish judge who pronounces judgment without orders and without mentioning law and rules and examples, that means a judge writes a wrong, improper or unacceptable judgment and he suffers for the same.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


You have written the review without any examples or illustration in support of your words of complain or criticism or comment or confusion.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


You have written the review without understanding the essence, inner essence, scope, perspectives, and horizon of thoughts poured and expressed in my work of poem.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


You have written the review without reading my Author Notes for you have no good habit of reading and like a greedy (foolish) person you comment on anything and everything instantly as I have written in my another work named ?Greedy?.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


You have truly written a whimsical, inadvertent, unfair, incomplete, impractical, derogatory, attacking, manipulative and inordinate review.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


Your review is self-explanatory and you cannot say or prove otherwise, for it speaks you are reluctant as you do not know the answer but simply for earning something you have written the review.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


Your review speaks your state of wisdom, stand of your intelligence, and status of your knowledge and experience and writing and ability to write reviews; I find it is derogatory, incomplete, incorrect and inhuman writing to harass a writer.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


Your review is not worthy, not praise worthy, not commendable, not recommendable or not mentionable, rather it is negative, derogatory, incomplete, incorrectly expressed with nothing to help the writer.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


Your review gives me information about your personality, you have not grown a good habit of reading, you have no patience to read what you are about to write a review thereon and that you are not a gentleman because you have not written anything responsibly to help the writer to help know his fault, drawback, if any.


My Author Note: Please read this Author Notes to save our priceless resources and to save our precious time


Why I write this line in my Author Notes of each of my work, as now you find, for writing a silly, foolish, incomplete, unfair, improper and incorrect review you have caused how much losses to me and how time you have wasted from my precious time.


As you have written the review so incorrectly and non-professionally, I have right to write the following lines:


We know God is God, but when God does wrong, we say, I mean, even if you are a good writer, as you think, there is no world recognition about this to you like a Nobel Prize for Literature, and being a so called good writer, if you murder, for example, to say, will the Judge spare you? in other words, I write, being a good writer, if you make mistakes, will the world spare you? no, no, no, particularly, when you deliberately do some crooked job, you have to take a punishment for such inhuman activity, it may be anything like as I write this or I have written this, for I cannot give or pronounce a punishment like a judge; though I know, this writing has no value or importance to you, evidently and truly, you studied so many religious scriptures, good books, still you do some crooked jobs, or inhuman acts or actions, or improper reviews, or foolish reviews, you do not fear God, you do not believe, as one sows so one reaps, you do not believe, every action has equal and opposite reaction, you have not learnt or known that nothing is unknown, unseen to God or by God, and He gives punishment without sound without warning in advance, I know you do not know or believe, there is God who is truly Omniscient (one who knows everything), Omnipotent (one who can do anything, anytime and anywhere and Omnipresent (one who is present everywhere, anywhere, any place within His created universe and world) so you can hide anything even to you, but you cannot hide anything to God and if you do harm to others, or cause losses to others, deliberately or ignorantly, you will have to accept punishment, whether you know, find, see, feel, realize or not, whether you are alive or dead, whether you believe it or not, man gets awards, rewards or punishments for what he does in his life or after.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


I request you to stop writing such non-helpful, controversial, incomplete and derogatory reviews to me. I have explained more than enough.


Your review: Hmm, okay, once I read the author notes and used the added glossary, I understood the meaning of the poem. And there lies the problem. It doesn't stand on its own. Without the notes, there is confusion.


Please do not take it personally, as you have done the job so you get this. I have no intention to hurt you. Why should I hurt you? I am not a fool. You have hurt me. You have caused harm to me. You have caused losses to me. You know the dog of the famous philosopher and scientist Newton caused losses to Newton, the dog did not know what he did. So you do not understand how much losses you have caused to me. I know you have words to plead you as even a criminal has words to plead, but Judge does not care.


As you have written a half-hearted, half, incomplete review, so I had to write about the same, I have no bad intention to write to you and hurt you. I know you know my feeling and state of mind after reading your two line review.


Please excuse me if anything hurts you.


Please do not take it personally.


I am sorry if I have written anything that hurts you but again I write I have written my true feelings after reading your derogatory review.


Thank you again for writing the wrong and improper review. I shall be always thankful to you if you stop writing such improper reviews in the future.


Wish you every success in your chosen goal,


With the kindest personal regards,

I salute you for your good jobs in
writing.


I condemn you for writing such a silly review.


God bless you.


Thanking you once again if you have read up to this.


Sincerely yours,


ALCREATOR LITT DEAR
14/06/2021
NIGHT, MONDAY
POST CYCLONE JOSH DAY
SICK IN BED DAY
RAINY DAY
CLOUDY AND WATERLOGGED DAY

Comment from Dolly'sPoems

Excellent

Homes in the mountains with views of God's creations and how wonderful to live in one of these homes, most impractical though, as I think of the shopping trip, much enjoyed, love Dolly x

 Comment Written 14-Jun-2021

Comment from ann marie mazz

Excellent

the appreciation for nature and beauty come through
may those notes of hearts continue to sing
a pleasure to read
the illustration is lovely
thank you for sharing

 Comment Written 18-Jul-2013

Comment from Joan E.

Excellent

I enjoyed your exuberant, 5-7-5 salute to nature. Your poem is intensified by your abundant use of alliteration and the striking photograph reinforces the theme. Happy holiday weekend- Joan

 Comment Written 30-Mar-2013

---

reply by the author on 01-Apr-2013

THANKS FOR PROFESSIONAL REVIEW.

reply by Joan E. on 01-Apr-2013

Many thanks for your gracious response. Have a productive new week- Joan

Comment from Chikara

Excellent

So here is your book's genesis.

I can't see a flaw; is this going to be typical? I suppose I can't expect less with how many reviews you must have since first writing this. I've shown up too late to help!

I hope I am interpreting the intent of your opening line correctly. I am supposing it is a euphemism illustrating God as love, shown through creation of valleys and inhabitable places. How much can having shelter fill one with mirth! And can not one by made from the simplest of natural elements?

This is a great piece. You've a knack for using few words to convey much meaning. Perhaps without flaw this time, but maybe I can find... something in the next one...

Your fitting start to the book leaves me optimistic of what follows.

 Comment Written 28-Mar-2013

---

reply by the author on 04-Apr-2013

THANKS FOR YOUR INSIGHTFUL PROFESSIONAL REVIEW.

Comment from prayingpoet

Excellent

Meets the 5-7-5 poem structure. It seems some of the words are strange or maybe backwards, but I do get the meaning. The artwork whet will with the nature thoughts.

 Comment Written 26-Mar-2013

Comment from Perp Ihebom

Excellent

This is a nice piece of nature poetry. Some of the expressions sound archaic but that ancient feeling is good as it matches with the content. kludos

 Comment Written 25-Mar-2013

Comment from cvcopac

Exceptional

Visual, and uplifting verse--a small, but lovely tribute to love, to cupid the champion of love. Strong assumption but strong imagery and metaphor as well. Enjoyable. Kenny

 Comment Written 25-Mar-2013